Kalit so‘zlar
Iqtibos keltirish tartibi
Annotatsiya
Maqolada Oʻzbekiston oliy taʼlim tashkilotlari milliy reytingidagi ilmiy nashrlar indikatori baholangan. Indikator Scopus bazasidagi Top 1% va Top 10% toifalaridagi hamda Q1-Q4 jurnallaridagi maqolalarni 12, 10, 8, 6, 4 va 1 vaznlar bilan birlashtiradi, natijani professor-oʻqituvchilar soniga boʻladi va toifa yetakchisiga nisbatan ballga aylantiradi. 2025-yil boʻyicha 105 ta oliy taʼlim tashkilotining rasmiy maʼlumotlari asosida bir-birini qoplaydigan vaznlar Q1 jurnalidagi bitta Top 1% maqolaga 30 vazn birligi berishi, nashrlarning 18,6 foizi esa kvartilga ega emasligi koʻrsatilgan. Muqobil vaznlar oliy taʼlim tashkilotlarining oʻrnini kam oʻzgartiradi: professor-oʻqituvchiga toʻgʻri keladigan nashrlar sonining oʻzi rasmiy ballar bilan ρ = 0,935 darajada bogʻliq. Bitta qoʻshimcha Q1 maqolaning qiymati bir toifa ichida 89 baravargacha farq qiladi, amaliy va tibbiyot toifalarida esa har oʻnta tashkilotdan taxminan toʻqqiztasi maksimal ballning 10 foizidan kam oladi. Rasmiy hisobotda tilga olingan logarifmik meʼyorlashtirish qoʻllanganida amaliy toifadagi median ball 0,072 oʻrniga 0,730 boʻlar edi. Maqolada har bir maqolani bir marta hisoblash, professor-oʻqituvchilar soni boʻyicha minimal chegara, yetakchiga kamroq bogʻliq meʼyorlashtirish indikator komponentlarini alohida eʼlon qilish hamda indikator surati va maxrajini bir xil asosda belgilash taklif etiladi.
Adabiyotlar ro‘yxati
1. Aagaard, K. (2015) ‘How incentives trickle down: local use of a national bibliometric indicator system’, Science and Public Policy, 42(5), pp. 725-737.
2. Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C.A. (2014) ‘How do you define and measure research productivity?’, Scientometrics, 101(2), pp. 1129-1144.
3. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L. and Mutz, R. (2013) ‘The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: opportunities and limits’, Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), pp. 158-165.
4. Butler, L. (2003) ‘Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications: the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts’, Research Policy, 32(1), pp. 143-155.
5. DORA (2013) San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Available at: https://sfdora.org/read/ (Accessed: 21 October 2026).
6. Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M. and Torrisi, G. (2019) ‘On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness’, Social Indicators Research, 141(1), pp. 61-94.
7. Hicks, D. (2012) ‘Performance-based university research funding systems’, Research Policy, 41(2), pp. 251-261.
8. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S. and Rafols, I. (2015) ‘Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics’, Nature, 520(7548), pp. 429-431.
9. National Agency for Quality Assurance in Education (2026) Oliy taʼlim tashkilotlarining milliy reytingini yuritish toʻgʻrisidagi nizom [Regulation on maintaining the national ranking of higher education institutions], approved by Order No. 8 of 6 February 2026, registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan on 28 February 2026, No. 3783. Tashkent. Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/8067678 (Accessed: 21 October 2026).
10. OECD and JRC (2008) Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.
11. Paruolo, P., Saisana, M. and Saltelli, A. (2013) ‘Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science?’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 176(3), pp. 609-634.
12. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2026) Oliy taʼlim, fan va innovatsiyalar tizimini takomillashtirishning qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida [On additional measures to improve the system of higher education, science and innovation], Decree No. PF-58 of 10 April 2026. Tashkent. Available at: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-8129755 (Accessed: 21 October 2026).
13. Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B. and Saltelli, A. (2011) ‘Rickety numbers: volatility of university rankings and policy implications’, Research Policy, 40(1), pp. 165-177.
14. Suleymanov, R., Mullaev, A. and Mahkamov, A. (2026) Oliy taʼlim tashkilotlarining ilmiy nashrlar faolligi va xalqaro iqtibos taʼsiri ("Scopus", 2025-yil): axborot-tahliliy sharh [Research publication activity and international citation impact of higher education institutions (Scopus, 2025): analytical review]. Tashkent: National Agency for Quality Assurance in Education.
15. Waltman, L. (2016) ‘A review of the literature on citation impact indicators’, Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), pp. 365-391.
Ushbu asar Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Xalqaro Litsenziyasi asosida litsenziyalangan.
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 Mamajonova, M.M. (Muallif)