BIOGAZ ISHLAB CHIQARISH QURILMALARI SAMARADORLIGIGA TA’SIR ETUVCHI ICHKI VA TASHQI OMILLAR
PDF

Kalit so‘zlar

biogaz anaerob digestiya ichki omillar tashqi omillar harorat psixrofil rejim qo‘shma fermentatsiya quyosh isitish tizimlari

Iqtibos keltirish tartibi

Yakubov, K. R., Qurbanov, O. O., & Rahimboyev, R. S. (2026). BIOGAZ ISHLAB CHIQARISH QURILMALARI SAMARADORLIGIGA TA’SIR ETUVCHI ICHKI VA TASHQI OMILLAR. Muqobil Energetika, 23(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.70769/2181-284.ME.2(23).2026.12

Annotatsiya

 Kirish. Biogaz ishlab chiqarish qurilmalarining samaradorligi ichki (harorat, pH darajasi, C/N nisbati, organik  yuklama tezligi – OLR, gidravlik saqlash vaqti – HRT va inhibtor moddalar) va tashqi (iqlim sharoitlari, xom ashyo zaxirasi, iqtisodiy to‘siqlar va texnik bilimsizlik) omillarga bog‘liq.

Material va usullar. Mazkur maqolaning maqsadi biogaz ishlab chiqarish samaradorligiga ta’sir etuvchi ichki va tashqi omillarni tizimli ravishda tahlil qilish hamda O‘zbekiston sharoitida ularni optimallashtirish imkoniyatlarini aniqlashdan iborat.

Natijalar. Adabiyot tahlili asosida optimal qiymatlar (mezofil rejimda harorat 35–40°C, pH 6.8–7.2, C/N 20–30:1) va buzilish oqibatlari (metan hosildorligining 30–80% ga pasayishi) aniqlandi. O‘zbekiston sharoitida sovuq kunlar (psixrofil rejim), chiqindi tashish muammolari va subsidiyalar yetishmasligi asosiy cheklovlar sifatida ko‘rsatildi.

Xulosa. Maqolada quyosh yordamida isitish, qo‘shma fermentasiya, mikroaerob sharoit va kichik bioreaktor kabi texnik yechimlar, shuningdek subsidiyalar, ta’lim dasturlari va pilot loyihalarni kengaytirish taklif etildi. Ushbu choralar amalga oshirilsa, O‘zbekistonda biogaz texnologiyalari samarali rivojlanib, qishloq xo‘jaligi chiqindilarini qayta ishlash va uglerod chiqindilarini kamaytirish maqsadlariga erishish mumkin.

PDF

Adabiyotlar ro‘yxati

[1]. Nwokolo N., et al. Factors affecting anaerobic digestion for biogas production: a review // Advanced Biorefineries for Sustainable Production and Distribution. – 2023. – DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85792-5.00020-4.

[2]. Alimoradi A., et al. Biogas: Production, properties, applications, economic and challenges: A review // Fuel. – 2024. – Vol. 377. – Art. 132782. – DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132782.

[3]. Bose D., et al. Emerging technologies for biogas production: A critical review on recent progress, challenges and future perspectives // Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. – 2024. – Vol. 103. – Art. 101345. – DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101345.

[4]. Elsharkawy K., et al. Enhancing anaerobic digestion efficiency: A comprehensive review on innovative intensification technologies // Energy Conversion and Management. – 2024. – Vol. 317. – Art. 118863. – DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118863.

[5]. Mittal S., et al. Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review // Energy Strategy Reviews. – 2019. – Vol. 26. – Art. 100414. – DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100414.

[6]. Glivin G., et al. A review on operating parameters, types of biodigesters, solar assisted heating systems, socio-economic benefits and challenges // Chemosphere. – 2022. – Vol. 293. – Art. 133579. – DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133579.

[7]. Saidmamatov O., Rudenko I., Baier U., Khodjaniyazov E. Challenges and solutions for biogas production from agriculture waste in the Aral Sea Basin // Processes. – 2021. – Vol. 9, No. 2. – Art. 199. – DOI: 10.3390/pr9020199.

[8]. Saidmamatov O., et al. Biogas production from agricultural waste in the Aral Sea Basin: Development of pilot plants. – REPIC Project Report, 2020.

[9]. Ibro M. K., et al. Biogas production optimization in the anaerobic codigestion process: A critical review on process parameters modeling and simulation tools // Journal of Chemistry. – 2024. – DOI: 10.1155/2024/4599371.

[10]. Advances and Challenges in Anaerobic Digestion for Biogas Production: Policy, Technological, and Microbial Perspectives // Processes. – 2025. – Vol. 13, No. 11. – Art. 3648. – DOI: 10.3390/pr13113648.

[11]. Kinetics and Energy Yield in Anaerobic Digestion: Effects of Substrate Composition and Fundamental Operating Conditions // Energies. – 2025. – Vol. 18, No. 23. – Art. 6262. – DOI: 10.3390/en18236262.

[12]. Optimization of the Factors Affecting Biogas Production Using the Taguchi Design of Experiment Method // Biomass. – 2024. – Vol. 4, No. 3. – P. 687–703. – DOI: 10.3390/biomass4030038.

[13]. Emerging materials and pretreatment strategies in anaerobic digestion for biogas production: A review on recent advances, limitations, and future perspectives // Industrial Crops and Products. – 2025. – Vol. 224. – Art. 120218. – DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120218.

[14]. New insights into the factors influencing methanogenic pathways in anaerobic digesters // Anaerobe. – 2024. – Art. 102925. – DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102925.

[15]. Effect of Anaerobic Digestion Parameters for Enhanced Biogas Production in Wastewater Treatment Process Using Statistical Experimental Design Analysis // International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. – 2024. – Vol. 16, No. 3. – DOI: 10.7763/IJESD.2024.V16.1524.

[16]. Development and performance analysis of a biogas reactor using livestock manure // Science, Technology and Environmental Trends. – 2025. – No. 1. – Art. 340385. – DOI: 10.21608/stet.2025.340385.

[17]. A critical review of biogas production and upgrading from organic wastes: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities // Biomass and Bioenergy. – 2025. – Vol. 194. – Art. 107566. – DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107566.

[18]. Investigating the barriers and mitigation strategies for biogas adoption in a developing economy: A multi-stakeholder networks perspective // Process Safety and Environmental Protection. – 2024. – DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.6281.

[19]. Kumar R., et al. A comprehensive review on biogas production from food waste: Exploring cutting-edge technologies and innovations // Bioresource Technology Reports. – 2024. – Vol. 25. – Art. 101739. – DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101739.

[20]. Biogases – Renewables 2025 – Analysis. – Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2025.

[21]. Reshaping Energy in Eurasia: Insights from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. – PwC Report. – 2025.

[22]. Moset V., Poulsen M., de Albuquerque B. M. R., Nielsen J. L. Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology // Microbial Biotechnology. – 2015. – Vol. 8, No. 5. – P. 787–800. – DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12271.

[23]. Saady N. M. C. Impact of organic loading rate on psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of solid dairy manure // Energies. – 2015. – Vol. 8, No. 3. – P. 1990–2015. – DOI: 10.3390/en8031990.

[24]. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Ekologiya, atrof-muhitni muhofaza qilish va iqlim o‘zgarishi vazirligi. «Ecoenergy» tadqiqot markazi hisoboti. – Toshkent, 2024.

Creative Commons License

Ushbu asar Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Xalqaro Litsenziyasi asosida litsenziyalangan.

Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 Yakubov, K.R., Qurbanov, O.O., Rahimboyev, R.S. (Muallif)

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hozircha mavjud emas.