Kalit so‘zlar
Iqtibos keltirish tartibi
Annotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada O‘zbekiston kichik korxonalarida mehnat xavfsizligi madaniyatining turli sohalardagi holatini qiyosiy tahlil qilish natijalari keltirilgan. Tadqiqot 2023–2025 yillarda Qashqadaryo viloyatidagi uch xil sohada faoliyat yurituvchi korxonalarda o‘tkazildi: to‘qimachilik va qandolatchilik, neft-gaz xizmatlari hamda xizmat ko‘rsatish sohalari. OSCI-UZ diagnostik indeksi yordamida 33 nafar xodim qamrab olingan holda xavfsizlik madaniyatining 7 ta asosiy o‘lchovi bo‘yicha batafsil baholash amalga oshirildi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatdiki, neft-gaz xizmatlari sohasida xavfsizlik madaniyati darajasi eng past (50,6 ball), to‘qimachilik va xizmat ko‘rsatish sohalarida esa nisbatan yuqori (58.0 ball) ekan. Barcha sohalarda hodisalardan o‘rganish o‘lchovi eng zaif (38,5–44,7 ball), me’yoriy rioya etilishi esa eng yuqori (61,7–68,5 ball) natijalarni ko‘rsatdi. Yaxshilash tadbirlari natijasida neft-gaz sohasida 24,1%, boshqa sohalarda 19,8% o‘sish qayd etildi. Sohalararo farqlar xavflilik darajasi, xodimlar tajribasi va korxona o‘lchamlari bilan bog‘liqligi aniqlandi.
Adabiyotlar ro‘yxati
[1] Cooper M.D., Finley L.J. Strategic safety culture roadmap // Professional Safety. – 1997. – Vol. 42. – No. 2. – P. 28-33.
[2] Flin R., Mearns K., O‘Connor P., Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features // Safety Science. – 2000. – Vol. 34. – No. 1-3. – P. 177-192.
[3] Parker S.K., Axtell C.M., Turner N. Designing a safer workplace: importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors // Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. – 2006. – Vol. 6. – No. 3. – P. 211-228.
[4] O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Mehnat vazirligi. 2023-yil mehnat xavfsizligi hisoboti. – Toshkent, 2024. – 87 b.
[5] International Labour Organization (ILO). Safety and health at work. – Geneva: ILO, 2023. – 145 p.
[6] Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. – London: Ashgate, 1997. – 252 p.
[7] Guldenmund F.W. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research // Safety Science. – 2000. – Vol. 34. – No. 1-3. – P. 215-257.
[8] Cooper M.D., Phillips R.A. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship // Journal of Safety Research. – 2004. – Vol. 35. – No. 5. – P. 497-512.
[9] Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests // Psychometrika. – 1951. – Vol. 16. – No. 3. – P. 297-334.
[10] Wiegmann D.A., Zhang H., von Thaden T.L., Sharma G., Mitchell A.A. A synthesis of safety culture and safety climate research. – University of Illinois, 2002. – 115 p.
[11] Hudson P. Safety culture – the ultimate goal // Flight Safety Australia. – 2001. – Vol. 5. – No. 4. – P. 29-31.
[12] G‘ayimnazarov Israil Xoliqovich, Mamarasulov Sobir Raxmonqulogli, and Toshmurodov Jomurod Jahongirogli. “O‘ZAN TUBI BARQARORLIGINI BAHOLASH USULLARI” Sanoatda raqamli texnologiyalar/Цифровые технологии в промышленности 4.1 (2026): 237-241.
[13] Neal A., Griffin M.A. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents // Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2006. – Vol. 91. – No. 4. – P. 946-953.
[14] Clarke S. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review // Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. – 2006. – Vol. 11. – No. 4. – P. 315-327.
[15] Saaty T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process // International Journal of Services Sciences. – 2008. – Vol. 1. – No. 1. – P. 83-98.
Ushbu asar Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Xalqaro Litsenziyasi asosida litsenziyalangan.
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 Mustafayev B.E. (Muallif)