IMPROVING THE RELIABILITY OF ENERGY-EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT FOR COMBINED-CYCLE CHP PLANTS BASED ON AN IMPROVED ENERGY BASELINE CALCULATION METHOD
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

measurement and verification robust regression confidence interval fuel characteristic technical diagnostics temperature normalization operational data energy-saving measures

How to Cite

Markov, A., & Novikova, O. (2026). IMPROVING THE RELIABILITY OF ENERGY-EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT FOR COMBINED-CYCLE CHP PLANTS BASED ON AN IMPROVED ENERGY BASELINE CALCULATION METHOD. Alternative Energy, 23(2), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.70769/2181-2284.ME.2(23).2026.27

Abstract

The article considers the problem of evidence-based determination of the energy effect of operating and organizational-technical measures at combined heat and power plants with combined-cycle units. It is shown that direct comparison of specific fuel consumption before and after a measure does not reliably separate real savings from the influence of outdoor air temperature, changes in electric and heat load, transient operating modes, and equipment technical condition. The aim of the study is to develop a normalized energy baseline suitable for assessing the actual performance of a unit under comparable operating conditions. The methodology is based on the calculation of total standard fuel consumption, a multivariable regression model, robust filtering of abnormal intervals and the construction of prediction confidence intervals. The model includes electricity and heat output, ambient temperature, indicators of the operating configuration, and an equipment-health index. Computational validation demonstrated a reduction in root mean square error from 2.8 to 1.4%, a decrease in systematic bias to +0.1%, and the ability to identify fuel savings of about 2-3 g of standard fuel per kWh. The proposed approach makes it possible to use the energy baseline as a tool for continuous monitoring, selection of optimal load schedules, and verification of energy-saving measures.

PDF (Russian)

References

1. ISO 50001:2018. Energy management systems - Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization, 2018.

2. ISO 50006:2023. Energy management systems - Evaluating energy performance using energy performance indicators and energy baselines. International Organization for Standardization, 2023.

3. ISO 50015:2014. Energy management systems - Measurement and verification of energy performance of organizations - General principles and guidance. International Organization for Standardization, 2014.

4. ГОСТ Р 57912-2017 (ИСО 50006:2014). Системы энергетического менеджмента. Измерение энергетических результатов на основе использования энергетических базовых линий и показателей энергетических результатов. Общие принципы и руководство.

5. Приказ Минэнерго России от 30.12.2008 № 323 «Об утверждении порядка определения нормативов удельного расхода топлива при производстве электрической и тепловой энергии».

6. Efficiency Valuation Organization. International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP): Core Concepts. EVO, 2022.

7. ASHRAE Guideline 14-2023. Measurement of Energy, Demand, and Water Savings. Atlanta: ASHRAE, 2023.

8. Wan A., Chen T. Performance degradation analysis of combined cycle power plant under high ambient temperature // Thermal Science. 2022. DOI: 10.2298/TSCI210221226W.

9. Hepperle N., Therkorn D., Schneider E., Staudacher S. Assessment of Gas Turbine and Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance Degradation // Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011. GT2011-45375. DOI: 10.1115/GT2011-45375.

10. Kurz R., Brun K. Degradation in Gas Turbine Systems // Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 2001. Vol. 123, No. 1. P. 70-77.

11. Ranjan R., Diakunchak I.S., Boyce M.P., Meher-Homji C.B. Modeling and Analysis of Gas Turbine Performance Deterioration // Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 1994. Vol. 116, No. 1. P. 46-52. DOI: 10.1115/1.2906808.

12. Аминов Р.З., Гариевский М.В. Эффективность работы парогазовых ТЭЦ при переменных электрических нагрузках с учетом износа оборудования // Известия РАН. Энергетика. 2018. № 4. С. 73-85.

13. Фархадзаде Э.М., Мурадалиев А.З., Рафиева Т.К., Рустамова А.А. Достоверность интегральных показателей эффективности работы энергоблоков ТЭС // Надежность и безопасность энергетики. 2020. № 1(48). С. 20-28.

14. Алексеюк В.Э., Максимов А.С., Сафронов П.Г. Усовершенствованная методика идентификации математических моделей теплоэнергетического оборудования // Вестник ИрГТУ. 2019. Т. 23, № 3. С. 503-515.

15. Зиновьева А.С. Совершенствование методик расчета технических и технико-экономических показателей работы парогазовых установок ТЭС: дис. ... канд. техн. наук. Иваново: ИГЭУ, 2025.

16. Kim M., Esfahani I.J., Lee S., Kim M., Yoo C. Performance assessment and system optimization of a combined cycle power plant based on exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses // Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2017. Vol. 34. P. 639-649.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Марков, А.С., Новикова, О.В. (Автор)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.