THEORETICAL AND SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE
PDF (Uzbek)

Keywords

regenerative agriculture sustainable development soil fertility agroecosystem organic matter biodiversity agroecological technologies regenerative livestock production agroforestry resource efficiency climate change

How to Cite

Amirkulov, S. O. (2026). THEORETICAL AND SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE. Innovation Economy, 10(10), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.70769/3030-315X.II.10.10.2026.7

Abstract

The article presents a systematic analysis of the theoretical and scientific foundations of regenerative agriculture, the evolution of its development, and international experience. The results of the analysis demonstrate that the integrated application of practices such as no-till and minimum tillage, cover cropping, crop rotation, organic farming, regenerative livestock production, managed grazing, and agroforestry contributes to restoring soil organic matter, conserving biodiversity, optimizing resource and production costs, and enhancing the resilience of agroecosystems. Based on international experience, regenerative agriculture is substantiated as an integrated environmental and economic model for sustainable development of the agricultural sector.

PDF (Uzbek)

References

1. Arora N. K. Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture Production and its Sustainable Solutions // Environmental Sustainability. 2019. № 2. Р. 95-96.

2. Beacham J. D., Jackson P., Jaworski C. C. (et al.) Contextualising Farmer Perspectives on Regenerative Agriculture: A Post-Productivist Future? // Journal of Rural Studies. 2023. Vol. 102. Р. 103100.

3. Brown K., Schirmer J., Upton P. Can Regenerative Agriculture Support Successful Adaptation to Climate Change and Improved Landscape Health Through Building Farmer Self-Efficacy and Wellbeing? // Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 4. Р. 100170.

4. Buck H. J., Palumbo-Compton A. Soil Carbon Sequestration as a Climate Strategy: What Do Farmers Think? // Biogeochemistry. 2022. № 161. P. 59-70.

5. Gosnell H. (et al). Climate Change Mitigation as a Co-Benefit of Regenerative Ranching: Insights from Australia and The United States // Interface Focus. 2020. № 10. Р. 20200027.

6. Kastner R. Hope for the Future: How Farmers Can Reverse Climate Change // Socialism and Democracy. 2016. Vol. 30. №. 2. С. 154-170.

7. Manzano P. Comparable GHG Emissions from Animals in Wildlife and Livestock-dominated Savannas // Climate and Atmospheric Science. 2023. № 6. Р. 27.

8. McGuire A. Regenerative Agriculture: Solid Principles, Extraordinary Claims. 2018. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://csanr.wsu.edu/regen-ag-solid-principles-extraordinary-claims (accessed June 22, 20

9. McMahon P. Investing in Regenerative Agriculture Reflections from the Past Decade. SLM Partners. White Paper (February 2024). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www. slmpartners.com/s/SLM-Partners-Investing-in-Regenerative-Agriculture-2024-White-Paper.pdf.

10. Miller-Klugesherz J. A., Matthew R. S. Good for the Soil, but Good for the Farmer? Addiction and Recovery in Transitions to Regenerative Agriculture // Journal of Rural Studies. 2023. Vol. 103. Р. 103123.

11. Montgomery D. R. Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations Paperback. University of California Press, 2012. 296 р.

12. Müller B., Johnson L., Kreuer D. Maladaptive Outcomes of Climate Insurance in Agriculture // Global Environmental Change. 2017. Vol. 46. Р. 2333

13. Naylor R. (et al.). The ‘Good Farmer’: Farmer Identities and The Control of Exotic Livestock Disease in England // Sociologia Ruralis. 2018. № 58 (1). Р. 3-19.

14. Rhodes C. J. The Imperative for Regenerative Agriculture //Science progress. 2017. Vol. 100. № 1. P. 80-129.

15. Schreefel L., Schulte R. P. O. (et al.) Regenerative Agriculture – The Soil is the Base // Global Food Security. 2020. Vol. 26. Р. 100404.

16. Shagaida N. I., Ternovsky D. S., Trotsuk I. V. Russia’s Ways to Ensure Food Security (Control Food Prices) in 2020-2022, and their Impact on Consumers // Russian Peasant Studies. 2023. Т. 8. № 3. С. 87-112

17. Soto R. L., de Vente J., Padilla M. C. Learning from Farmers’ Experiences with Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Regenerative Agriculture Based on Visual Soil Assessment // Journal of Rural Studies. 2021. Vol. 88. P. 192-204.

18. Soto R. L., Padilla M. C., de Vente J. Participatory Selection of Soil Quality Indicators for Monitoring the Impacts of Regenerative Agriculture on Ecosystem Services // Ecosystem Services. 2020. Vol. 45. Р. 101157.

19. Tan S. S. X., Kuebbing S. E. A Synthesis of the Effect of Regenerative Agriculture on Soil Carbon Sequestration in Southeast Asian Croplands // Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2023. Vol. 349. P. 108450.

20. Tanneberger F. (et al.) Quantifying Ecosystem Services of Rewetted Peatlands − The Moor Futures Methodologies // Ecological Indicators. 2024. № 163. P. 112048.

21. Teague R., Barnes M. Grazing Management that Regenerates Ecosystem Function and Grazingland Livelihoods // African Journal of Range & Forage Science. 2017. № 34 (2). Р. 77-86.

22. Uzun V., Shagaida N., Lerman Z. Russian Agriculture: Growth and Institutional Challenges // Land Use Policy. 2019. № 83. Р. 475-487

23. Zhu Q., Jia R., Lin X. Building Sustainable Circular Agriculture in China: Economic Viability and Entrepreneurship // Management Decision. 2019. Vol. 57. № 4. P. 1108-1122.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Amirqulov, S.O. (Muallif)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.